FR · EN Home · Platforms · YouTubers · Ranking · Log in

Evevest

Logo Evevest

Investment advice · France

Evaluation of 2026-09-04
initial · 50 points out of 93 applicable
45/100
Documented failures on structural points
25
40
55
70
85
▲ cap 45 (raw 54)

Verdict

Evevest is a duly registered French financial investment advisor (SASU, Paris trade register 928 699 073, CIF ORIAS 24004683, member of an approved association): from a strictly regulatory standpoint, no proceedings target the company itself and the entity is fully identifiable. The score nonetheless remains capped at 45/100 because of an "officer" flag: according to the video investigation "Alerte : RealT utilise des faux comptes pour vous arnaquer !" (6 April 2026), which presents screenshots and phone evidence, the phone number of Evevest's founder and president, Anne-Laure Jacobson (née Frischlander), was used on RealT's Telegram under a false identity to mislead investors. For the director of a regulated investment company, an unexplained multiple identity used to manipulate savers is a major integrity signal, regardless of the fact that the events concern another platform (RealT, now in liquidation and targeted by a criminal complaint in Paris as well as a class action). Added to this are structural weaknesses: a very young company (created in May 2024), no accounts filed or certified, performance presented as simulations ("superformance") rather than a real, exhaustive track record, a poorly documented fund-segregation mechanism, and a paid Evevest+ club (€50 then €19.90/month) that layers extra pricing onto the managed-portfolio service. Draft — pending a possible right of reply: Evevest may at any time provide documents and clarifications, the record will be re-scored and the change will appear in the history.

Members-only record

The breakdown of the 31 indicators, the red flags, the officers, the sources and the correction history are reserved for registered members. Registration is free and takes less than a minute.

Log in Sign up

The full methodology and rating scale remain freely accessible. See the methodology

Last checked2026-09-04
Questionnaire sentnot provided
Company responseno response
Conflict of interestNo position, no partnership

View the record history: past evaluations, corrections, former sources and control dates